11/09/2007

Bomb Threat, Polarized Glass and International Trade Disputes

Last week, Assembly president Francisco Pacheco ordered that the glass that separates visitors’ gallery (la barras) from the plenary where the deputies are, to be polarized. From now on, visitors can look inside (although with greater difficulty) but the deputies can no longer see the visitors. Pacheco calls this a palliative measure because deputies have been insulted by posters, gestures and writings on the glass, and proceedings have t times been interrupted by protests in the barras. At the some time, supposedly to make it easier for the visitors to see through the glass, the outside windows of the barras have been covered up, not only not letting in anymore light, but also making it impossible for the people inside the barras to communicate to those outside in front of the building. In the past, protestors inside the barras could communicate with the crowd outside and vice versa. Also, the floor of the barras, previously made of wood, has been tiled, apparently to limit the impact of foot-stomping. The climate inside the assembly had grown increasingly hostile over the previous week, mostly around the issue of PLN deputy Fernando Sanchez, co-author of the infamous memorandum. Protestors insist that he step down. While the deputies complained about the aggression and obscenity of posters and gestures in the barras, PLN deputy Jimenez cracked an ill-fated joke about an 85 year old woman, who comes every day to demand that Sanchez step down. Saying that the old woman had better stay home and say rosaries, he played into the hands of he movement, picked up that remark and proceeds to portray it as iconic for the general attitude the Grupo de los 38 (G38, the 38 deputies who support the CAFTA and the Agenda) takes towards the people.

On Thursday, a bomb threat in the afternoon forced the evacuation of the entire Assembly building, spilling deputies and staff directly into a crowd of protestors who were there as part of the nationwide campaign against the Agenda de Implementación, which kicked off that day. No bomb was found and speculation as to whether the anonymous phone call was placed by a member of the opposition to disrupt work on the Agenda, or a member of the pro-Agenda side to strengthen their arguments that the NO-TLC forces are getting increasingly violent and dangerous, abound. The day before, the security services of the Assembly decided to provide personal bodyguards to the deputies.

Meanwhile, the G38, making up the absolute majority in the Assembly, are working hard on the passage of the 13 Agenda Laws before the March 1 deadline. They are holding three daily sessions, a morning, afternoon, and evening session every day. They voted to apply fast-track legislation to several of the bills, and their staffers are meeting daily to reduce the length of proposals so as to limit their discussion time, by erasing less important aspects altogether and synthesizing remaining points into a smaller number. Since they are required by the constitution to discuss the national budget during the month of November, the budget is being passed in absolute record time, with almost no interference by members of the G38. The first law of the Agenda, the Ley de Protección de Representantes de de Casas Extranjeras, which makes it possible for trade disputes between Costa Rican and foreign businesses to be litigated in non-Costa Rican courts, has already passed. Critics of the law, first and foremost the PAC, have argued that it places small and medium sized producers, which make up 90% of Costa Rican businesses, at great disadvantage because the vast majority of them lack the resources to put up a reasonable legal defense in the American court system, especially if they are up against large corporations.

Adding insult to injury, President Arias has announced a CAFTA signing ceremony for next Wednesday, which will take place at the Teatro Melico Salazar, the same place where the Anti-CAFTA movement kicked off its campaign to defeat the CAFTA two years ago. The movement views this a pure provocation. Protests are expected.

Also last week, the six unions that comprise the workers of the state electricity and telecommunications institute, ICE, made public their intention to go on strike, if necessary to stop the opening of that sector. Fabio Chavez, of the union ASDEICE said in an interview that the union recognizes the results of the referendum but does not see them as binding on their actions because of fraud and deceit.

11/05/2007

Opposition rejects referendum results, vows to fight Agenda de Implementación

On October 27, representatives of the different social movements that constitute the Movimiento del NO, gathered for Asamblea Nacional Patriotica. About 2000 delegates from the Patriotic Committees, Student and Labor Unions, and the various others groups that make up this diverse movement, came together to deliberate over the referendum, whether or not to accept the results, take decisions about movement structures and leadership, and devise a plan of action after CAFTA passed the referendum.

The result was a manifesto of ten main points that is now being distributed to base organizations throughout the country. Perhaps the most striking outcome of the assembly are the signs that the movement is becoming increasingly aware of its potential and of its character as a unified movement. Thus, more permanent structures were established in the form of a Coordinación Nacional made up of two representatives from each of the participating movements. Eugenio Trejos was elected to head the Coordinación. Delegates also voted to strengthen the Patriotic Committees and create a national communications network to facilitate the spreading of information. The following is a summary of the most important decisions taken:

1) Reject the result of the referendum because of structural and media fraud

2) Take all the necessary actions to study, educate about, and fight the Agenda de Implementación on the national, regional and local level.

3) Demand the renunciation of deputy Fernando Sanchez, as well as the magistrates of the Supreme Electoral Tribunal, the five judges of the Sala IV (constitutional court) that supported the TLC, and the 73 mayors that fought for the TLC with public money. The movement also demands the expulsion of the US ambassador.

4) Pressure the deputies in favor of the TLC and the Agenda inside and outside of the Congress with the necessary actions.

5) Support the deputies who are against the TLC and the Agenda with all means necessary.

6)Take up the following immediate actions:

Define a resistance strategy with coordinated and simultaneous actions at all levels, beginning with the first on November 7.

Commit to opposition to the plans regarding the opening and concession of semi-public instutions. Defend and back up the social and economic institutions which make up the base of solidaric and inclusive development model, among them the CCSS (social security), the ICE (electricity and telecom), the INS (insurance), and the JAPDEVA (infrastructure and ports of the Caribbean).

Boycott the companies that supported the TLC and/or were involved in the fraud.

Demand an end to the repressive actions against workers who are part of the Movement of the NO.

Demand a reform of the referendum rules to ensure the protection of the constitutional rights to equality of divulgation of information and use of public resources, as well as the right to non-interference from foreign actors.

If you ask yourself as I did, what “coordinated and simultaneous action beginning Nov.7” means, I think that this vagueness demonstrates the decentralized nature of the movement, basically asking the base to do whatever they can and are willing without exposing itself to repression. The Costa Rican government has passed a serious of laws that are intended to criminalize the kind of public resistance displayed in the Combo del ICE conflict in 2000. Perhaps the most prominent is Law 4573, which makes it a punishable crime to hinder the flow of traffic – a very convenient way to arrest demonstrators. The police has been demonstratively recording images of protestors during demonstrations. Police officers in full gear stand on elevated platforms and film everything that goes on. From my conversations with activists, I get the idea that the movement is preparing for active attempts of repression and wants to a) minimize the possible attrition of activists, and b) not play into the hands of the law enforcement and security apparatus. Watch for the next blog entry to read more about this.

Secondly, the regarding the pressure on deputies who support the TLC and the Agenda, the main website of the NO has begun to post images and names of those deputies with humorous and at times pretty mean descriptions of their role in the process causing Independent (recently split from the Movimiento Libertario) Evita Arguedas to express worries for her safety with great media resonance during one of the legislative sessions last week. To see them, click on the No TLC link.

Also, to read the entire Agenda decided on by the Asemblea Nacional Patriotica, go to http://www.notlc.com/27_OCTUBRE_ACUERDOS.html.